Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality in Albania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Sexuality in Albania

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I think that the article should be deleted because it is a wp:cfork of LGBT rights in Albania, Albanian sworn virgins and Recognition of same-sex unions in Albania  — ZjarriRrethues —  talk 17:48, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. There's no need to have this kind of article, and if there's really any useful information that isn't yet included in some other article, we could merge it into another aticles. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 19:27, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Kedadi  talk  21:24, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I started this article, and because zjarri and keda want to delete it i agree with them! -22:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: the article was not created by Vinie007 who wrote the above line but by Albanian222 (unless someone just admitted to using two accounts at once). De728631 (talk) 23:27, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok sorry formulated wrong Albanian222 is bro's account, so started by him


 * Keep every country will eventually have a "Sexuality in ____" article. See Sexuality in the People's Republic of China and Sexuality in Japan. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. And I sure hope you're wrong, Heroeswithmetaphors... Carrite (talk) 04:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's the typical article prone to OR. --  S ulmues (talk) 02:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 14:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.