Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexuality in Bangladesh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator's account was globally locked for long term abuse. All comments here are in support of keeping the article - this seems like a pretty clear cut keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti*Let's talk!* 11:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Sexuality in Bangladesh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Given references are not strong enough about the topic. Shoikot H  (talk)   (cont)   13:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The article as it stands is no more than an outline for a topic that could be developed considerably. However what’s already there looks properly sourced to me. It does look like a loose collection of stuff that the creator has pulled together under the umbrella of ‘Sexuality’ so I searched to see whether the topic ‘Sexuality in Bangladesh’ is itself notable, and it clearly is as there are plenty of research studies in this field. So while the article needs improvement, I don’t see a case for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Mccapra's reasoning. --John B123 (talk) 08:26, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs to be elaborated.  TBF 93  ( talk ) 15:09, 30 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.