Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexy Album (Smosh)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Sexy Album (Smosh)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources at all that I could find. Album fails GNG, and before you even bother, need for sources trumps the "albums of notable artists are notable" argument. See WP:42.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  01:10, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no reliable sources found to even verify its existence. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Huh? When I followed the reference link in the article (http://itunes.apple.com/us/album/sexy-album/id417811116), I got an iTunes page offering to sell me said album. Clearly it exists if Apple and Amazon are willing to sell it to me, and the google test returns results as well. That said, I'm not seeing third party coverage, so it seems to me that this album can just be discussed inside the main Smosh article, which isn't exactly overfull at this point. Zachlipton (talk) 10:03, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.