Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane 2007  talk 20:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Membership of the Assembly of Experts would appear to constitute a pass of WP:POLITICIAN. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 09:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NPOLITICIAN as a member of the Assembly of Experts, see Iranian Assembly of Experts election, 2016 (have fixed the red link). Coolabahapple (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Coolabahapple, my reading of the Assembly of Experts fits with WP:NPOLITICIAN. Smmurphy(Talk) 16:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:NPOLITICIAN. Pahlevun (talk) 13:10, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep From what I understand of the notability guidelines for politicians, the subject's position on a national-level government body would help him to pass the notability test. Now notability isn't a guarantee of inclusion in the encyclopedia, but there seem to be sufficient sources at least for a stub article (which seems to be the current state). If anything, a search should be done to expand the article; deletion seems out of the question. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.