Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seymour Koblin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Seymour Koblin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an unreferenced piece of spam. The "criticism" section is taken from the Andrew Weil article; those critics, for all I can tell, haven't bothered with criticizing or mentioning Koblin. No indication the subject is notable, nothing independent and reliable found via Google. Huon (talk) 19:44, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Graham11 (talk) 19:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I think this one should be salted, it is just too promotional and the topic person too far from the mark. Fails WP:GNG, no claim to notability, self-serving promotion. --Bejnar (talk) 21:17, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is highly promotional and full of dubious unsourced claims, both about the subject himself and about his methods. Absolutely no independent sourcing found in a search. --MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.