Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sha.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Sha.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable artist, promotional article from COI SPA editor. almost no references in respectable publications Rayman60 (talk) 23:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No hits in either Standard, Presse, Salzburger Nachrichten, Wiener Zeitung, or Falter archives. Brief mention in a 2001 issue of Profil but nothing substantial. German Wikipedia article seems to have avoided deletion mainly due to a few local circlejerk awards that thankfully do not count here. Damvile (talk) 07:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia appears to be the best source for this material, as in there aren't any others.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:31, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I can't find anything beyond Sha.'s website. Even with the names of the projects and awards, I can't find anything. Nothing on ZKM was the key for me. I would be happy to change my vote if someone was able to verify any of these claims. --Theredproject (talk) 00:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Here's a primary source for the Ars Electronica Centre residency that 'involved' ZKM. Not very useful.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I wondered about the sources if any of them were confusing the artist with Sha (singer). Though they don't. The awards and projects would establish the notability for an artist but in this case they are itself not very notable or the SPA who created the page couldn't get the names correct. Excelse (talk) 09:52, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG no significant coverage in reliable mainstream media -- D Big X ray ᗙ  09:12, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:GNG. Adamtt9 (talk) 14:20, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.