Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabbethai Panzieri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Shabbethai Panzieri

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only ref on the page is a very old Jewish encyclopedia. Nothing much else found, little reason to think this is a notable person other than presence in another encyclopedia. JMWt (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Italy. JMWt (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep. The encyclopedia entry is a good sign for notability, and it looks like it cites several non-English sources; at minimum those should be checked for coverage. Having this much information on someone from the seventeenth century usually suggests notability, and it's not surprising that there aren't a ton of sources in English available online.— Moriwen (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep -- The fact that it's in the Jewish Encyclopedia is sufficient to establish notability, as is inclusion in *any* reliable encyclopedia. There is an entire wikiproject devoted to creating articles based on this sole criterion. The fact that the encyclopedia is "very old" is the reddest of herrings. After all, WP:NTEMP. The linked JE article has plenty of sources, as Moriwen notes. Central and Adams (talk) 23:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability is demonstrated based on the encyclopedia source provided. It does not decline over time nor does the value of the "very old Jewish encyclopedia" as a source. The article for Joseph Fiametta, which is interconnected with this one, provides an example of how additional sources should be added here. Alansohn (talk) 00:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Inclusion of a topic in a scholarly encyclopedia is prima facie evidence of notability. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: per above, being in a known encyclopedia meets WP:GNG. She was  a fairy 02:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.