Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabnam Dutta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice. Unsourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Shabnam Dutta

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Self-promotion, lacks notability and reliable sources. Expanding on these:

There are no reliable sources cited to establish notability. Cited source primarily include youtube videos (likely self-published). A google search fails to reveal any credible sources.

Majority of the content written by user "SpncerJones", whose sole contributions include creating pages for the subject of this article, her spouse, and adding their names to the list of "notable alumni" for their respective colleges.

Includes unsourced promotional quips for family members under Trivia ( none of which is verifiable by google searches ). This theme of cyclic promotion is also evident in the corresponding article for her spouse ( see Manish Sahi ).

The above, in addition to the tone of the article and the improper use of full caps to highlight "accomplishments" strongly indicate this to be a self-promotional article.

ViaOxford (talk) 12:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:26, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 16:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.