Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shad Lierley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 11:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Shad Lierley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is an MMA fighter who fails to meet WP:NMMA. The article has no sources except for a link to his fight record and my search turned up no significant coverage. All I found was some routine sports coverage and youtube videos. Papaursa (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NMMA. IronKnuckle (talk) 19:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note -- IronKnuckle has been indef blocked for various reasons. Also -- those who have familiarity with that approach to editing, and unearthing puppets, might keep that in mind as we look at contributions of others to AfDs upon which he !voted.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No major accomplishments and a lack of source-verified claims to notabilty. - MrX 21:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing outside of routine coverage.Coffeepusher (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The fighter does not meet WP:NMMA nor do they seem to meet the standard WP:GNG. Mkdw talk 09:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same reasons identified above.Kabirat (talk) 09:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.