Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadi A. Alshdaifat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:32, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Shadi A. Alshdaifat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was recently accepted at AfC, but it does not meet any of the criteria at WP:NPROF or WP:BASIC. There is a lack of reliable sources covering the subject, he has not received a significant appointment or award, and there is no evidence that any of his work has been highly cited. Bradv 🍁  21:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough sources and does not pass notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject has only a handful of citations reported by Google Scholar, so does not pass WP:PROF, and there is no indication that he might pass any other criterion of WP:PROF or the general notability guideline. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment:He is an Associate Professor at the University of Sharjah. Later I have also found out that he was the head of the Public Law Department at Isra University. Doesn't this make him notable according to WP:NACADEMIC point number 5 or does it have to be any higher post to be eligible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spalko Irina (talk • contribs) 04:12, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Point 5 is for people who have a position higher than full professor on the basis of their scholarly accomplishments. Head of department is an administrative rather than scholarly accomplishment. There is a different point of WP:PROF that applies to administrators (number 6), but it's only for heads of entire universities. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. No evidence of passing WP:PROF. He does appear to have at least one published book ("International Law and the Use of Force Against Terrorism") and despite its publisher's not-entirely-stellar reputation I did find one published review of it. It's not enough for WP:AUTHOR but if we could only double both the number of published books and published reviews per book I could easily change my mind. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:50, 18 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.