Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadora


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Shadora

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability, Layout, Nosources Night Fury (A good day to Die Hard) 14:32, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk to me  16:40, 15 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: Towns of any population, anywhere, are notable. Layout problems are not a reason for deletion. And references can be found; in fact, I did, and plugged one in at the top. This article should be cleaned up/TNT'ed, but AfD is not for cleanup. Reminder to the nominator of WP:BEFORE. Dea  db  eef  18:02, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: another ref added. We normally keep articles about inherently notable locations, no matter the quality of the article. See WP:Articles_for_deletion/Washington-Wheatley,_Kansas_City, Articles_for_deletion/List_of_hills_of_Porto_Alegre and WP:Articles for deletion/Ternopil State Medical University Noyster  (talk),  14:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like a real place to me. It even has its own, and busy, railroad station.--Oakshade (talk) 01:48, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per WP:GEOLAND - names and populated places are inherently notable. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.