Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShadowFall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per author request. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

ShadowFall

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested PROD. There is no indication of notability in this yet-to-be-released book. There are no references or other reliable sources listed, so it fails WP:RS and WP:GNG. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 02:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- ArcAngel (talk) (review) 02:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom... and most likely spam. And WP:CRYSTAL. And whatnot. Should've been speedied. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This AfD can be closed as the author has blanked the page, and I have placed db-g7 on the page. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 20:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.