Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowfind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  21:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Shadowfind

 * — (View AfD)

Prod removed without comment. Repeated insistence from newly registered SPA's that this is real, but no Reliable Sources of any sort provided despite repeated requests. Maybe real, maybe not. Certainly not Notable. -- Fan-1967 15:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Edison 16:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete reasons listed above /Blaxthos 17:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete real or not, this isn't notable and there are no sources to confirm anything. -- Whpq 17:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (full disclosure: I was the prodder) --Icarus (Hi!) 18:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. There are 23 Google hits for "Sir Shadowfind," largely from BDSM blogs and forums.  Arguably this fellow is real, but who cares?  Masterduke55 and Jennygirl2, the creator and the one contesting the prod, are newly registered users with no other edits.  RGTraynor 21:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * As is, who also showed up to defend the article. Fan-1967 21:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom agree, non-noteable. Davidpdx 10:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.