Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowgirls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Shadowgirls

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I initially nominated for speedy, but its been the subject of one before. I found a RS source that had the author quoted as saying he was going to start it but no source after it. Thus non -notable. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 05:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete barring the emergence of a third party reliable source covering the webcomic in order to establish notability. TomPointTwo (talk) 07:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and I agree with the iriginal speedy, no notability is asserted. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Its mentioned during an interview along with another comic made by the same artist, they giving it coverage plus showing some images of it at . comicbookresources.com I believe is a reliable source, there even a Wikipedia article on it.   D r e a m Focus  04:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * yep thats the one RS i found mentioning it at all, no follow ups on it on CBR or newsarama. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 04:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a single reliable source in the article. --Novil Ariandis (talk) 09:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.