Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shady Lawn Field


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  03:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Shady Lawn Field

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clearly non-notable private general aviation airport. None of the sources come remotely close to contributing any sort of notability. Did a basic BEFORE search and came up with nothing useful, just lots of stuff about handling a lawn that has shade. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Michigan. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 14:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. All sources are primary. There's no notability, also not for the company. gidonb (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete We're not supposed to engage in whataboutism, but to keep this airport would mean that every airport in the U.S. would be included. WP is not a directory. Rhadow (talk) 22:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not sure where I think the line for notability should be, but this is definitely not it. tedder (talk) 23:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. This page is by far not the only one about an airport that is statistic-heavy, and I think it's still important to have information about it available. I'm working to add additional information about it to expand the page and prove its notability.--Slowtationjet (talk) 17:19, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Spamming primary sources will not help. It doesn't matter if you find 500 of them, that won't show notability. If you cannot identify significant coverage in secondary sources, honestly you'd be better off directing your efforts elsewhere (hint: every source in the article right now is primary, and "Michigan Department of Transportation" with no further information isn't even a reference at all). Trainsandotherthings (talk) 17:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.