Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shah Sauchyar Gardezi Sabri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Shah Sauchyar Gardezi Sabri

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced sub-stub that gives no useful information or context as to who the subject is. The article seems to imply through an image, and an unhelpful entry on List of shrines - that he's in some way involved with a fairly impressive-looking shrine in Pakistan. I can't find any information to source or expand the article, but given my lack of knowledge of the area I thought I'd bring it for discussion rather than simply speedy deleting it under A1. ~ mazca  talk 12:58, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  chat 19:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Wow, this is a really good mystery. Regular searches turn up little and what there is in Pakistani(maybe) that is giving the translator trouble and coming garbled. This may be a stretch but he seems to be some kind of musician to me. Often sites have him in relation to Melas, which are festivals in the Hindu tradition on the subcontinent. Melas in March and April 2009 especially. I suggest adding to more lists of related discussions to expand exposure: Hindu, India and Musicians perhaps. I don't know how to do this, hopefully someone else can. Outback the koala (talk) 09:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * I cannot find anything either, and there is an almost complete lack of context in the article and in previous edits by the article's creator here and at Commons. This article, more superficially substantive than most no context articles that are speedily deleted, simply lacks the information necessary for anyone to work on it.  It's the picture that makes it look more than it truly is, I think.  &#9786; Uncle G (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.