Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahbal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep.  E LIMINATOR JR  15:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Shahbal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Recreated expired prod. Non-notable university project. Stephen1-800-STEVE 03:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of "significant coverage from independent sources" Corpx 06:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, WP:AIR team discovered this article today and we'll working on improving it. Piotr Mikołajski 20:10, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - as per Piotr Mikołajski. MilborneOne 21:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Piotr Mikołajski. The article needs reliable sources, though. --Aarktica 23:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Relister's comment: The article still lacks any reliable sources, and no notability is evident, either. The subsequent discussion should address these issues. Sandstein 17:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Shahbal was awarded the Best Design Prize during the first National UAV Design Competition (NUDC-2006) is adequately sourced by the site for the competition. It's independent of the subject & I think reliable for the purpose. More would of course be better. Notability is not as a university project. Notability is as an experimental airplane. DGG (talk) 20:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - It defintely needs some reliable sources to verify its factuality, but it does appears quite notable. Find sources and then I believe it falls under the laws of inclusion. Not that they are really laws, but just policy. Ahhh, you get my point. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( ταlκ ) 22:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.