Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahnawaz Farooqui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Shahnawaz Farooqui

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable journalist. Notability is not established via independent third party sources. A google search (sans wikimirrors, facebook, blogs) shows only 244 hits). No third party coverage from reliable sources can be found on the subject's notability. Ragib (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 20:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Google News search linked above finds several sources describing the subject as "renowned", "prominent", "leading", "noted" etc. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:41, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Care to tell us why he's notable? Refs? --Ragib (talk) 04:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Per wp:notability and . ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 01:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per ChildOfMidnight. Repeatedly described by sources as "renowned intellectual". cab (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: And sources which describe the subject as "renowned" do not satisfy WP:N or WP:GNG. To satisfy either one, there must be reliable sources which "discuss the subject in significant detail."  These G-News articles quote Farooqui, but they're not about him.  Does anyone have any which do to submit?   RGTraynor  13:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.