Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahraban Abdullah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  03:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Shahraban Abdullah
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. The article is about The first doctor from the United Arab Emirates to specialize in cardiology for pediatrics, which appears to be very specific and not something worthy of notability. She is also the chairperson of some committees, but they don't appear to be of importance. I couldn't find any information on the internet to verify notability. Lolekek (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Lolekek (talk) 17:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lolekek (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment She is the first female doctor in her field which in UAE might be quite a significant achievement. However, I cannot find WP:SIGCOV other than the sources already mentioned in the page. As a researcher she only (co)authored four papers. Broc (talk) 19:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and NPROF Okoslavia (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. The achievement doesn't seem to have translated into in-depth coverage in reliable sources, which is the main thing we're here to evaluate. (I checked in both English and Arabic and didn't find anything; although I suppose it's possible there are Arabic sources I'm missing, that possibility isn't enough to affect my !vote.) As there's no apparent argument for an WP:NPROF pass, delete is the right outcome here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not enough significant coverage to meet the requirements of notability. 1keyhole (talk) 02:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.