Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahre Mubarak Grand Masjid Calicut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Shahre Mubarak Grand Masjid Calicut

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails WP:FUTURE and cites no references indicating why this mosque is yet significant or notable. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  —Inks.LWC (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. It does now. Withdrawal would be appreciated. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - It still seems far to early in the making to fall under something that is acceptable under the WP:FUTURE policy. Inks.LWC (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Also a comment. This thing, it seems to me, is notable even if they never build it--and there obviously is plenty of coverage already. FUTURE has no bearing here; it passes easily per GNG. Drmies (talk) 00:52, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Enough sources have been added since the discussion was opened to indicate that it meets the GNG. Qrsdogg (talk) 00:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article's reference are enough to establish notability. I would suggest, though, that it be moved to Shahre Mubarak Grand Masjid. Calicut is the proposed mosque's location, but it doesn't seem to be part of the name of the mosque, so it doesn't need to be in the article's title. Dawn Bard (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.