Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahrokh Zamani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 15:39, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Shahrokh Zamani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable activist. The circumstances may me notable, but I question the individual's notability. Article reads like a political statement. red dogsix (talk) 01:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - If the current article reads like a political statement, the answer is cleanup, not deletion. The only question is notability.  The subject is the focus of numerous reliable bylined secondary sources, which is our typical criteria, but I could see a potential argument for WP:BIO1E, hence my "weak" keep !vote.  That said, the event attracted the attention of amnesty international, as well as other big name sources, which I think is sufficient to merit conclusion, so I do maintain keep.   Fieari (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 12:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.