Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahrom Abubakr


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nakon 01:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Shahrom Abubakr

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP (well the only ref was to youtube which I got rid of) with no sign of notability. Wgolf (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tajikistan-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 03:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Absolutely. No references at all, basically a stub that somehow wasn't caught.-- A Wild Abigail Appears!  Capture me.   Moves.  17:06, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unquestionably non-notable. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * -yeah I know its amazing how every so often we find some article that is really old that was never caught till now! Wgolf (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh well, first world 4 million article encyclopedia problems lmao. Some always slip through the cracks, luckily it's editors like us who find them :)--- A Wild Abigail Appears!  Capture me.   Moves.  18:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: A Google search using the Cyrillic/Tajik version of the subject's name makes me think that the subject may well be notable - but if so, the reliable sources all seem to be in Tajik. If, sometime during this AfD, a Tajik-speaker can check for sources and add any good ones to the article, then we may be able to keep it - but otherwise, we unfortunately have no basis on which to keep. PWilkinson (talk) 23:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)