Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahveer Jafry (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Shahveer Jafry
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously deleted multiple times. Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. Saqib (talk) 11:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:44, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Comedians and YouTubers are not handed an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist — they need some evidence that they've achieved something noteworthy beyond simply existing. But three of the five footnotes cited here aren't reliable sources at all, and even the two that are reliable sources aren't helping very much — one is a short blurb covering him entirely in a non-notable context, while the other is a Q&A interview in which he's speaking about himself rather than being written about in the third person. All of which means that exactly zero of these sources are contributing anything toward establishing him as notable per WP:GNG, and nothing stated in the article body is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to pass GNG. Salt may also be necessary, because in addition to the first discussion this has also been speedied two other times as a recreation of deleted content. Bearcat (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete until notability is fully established.  Mehra j Mir  (talk) 15:55, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP should have a bot-search for "aspiring film maker and actor; currently a daily vlogger" which automatically deletes such BLPs.  We may delete a few that should be saved, but will delete a far (far, far) greater quantity that should not be in WP.  In this case, the subject clearly fails GNG.  This should definately be salted given history. Britishfinance (talk) 19:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.