Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shai Cherry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Shai Cherry

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of Notability Prof. Cherry is an innovative junior scholar. Perhaps someday he will be notable. Currently, however, he is among many emerging yet not-yet-notable scholars. HG | Talk 21:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Defo not notable by any measure at the moment. Give him 40 years. scope_creep 21:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 05:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete insufficiently notable. JJL 23:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
 * comment the article lists three sources, two of which are posted articles on MyJewishLearning.com, that turn out to be excerpts from ""Three twentieth-century Jewish responses to evolutionary theory," in Aleph: Historical Studies in Science & Judaism (Magnes Press)." & "Three Twentieth-Century Jewish Responses to Evolutionary Theory," Aleph: Historical Studies in Science and Judaism, 2003 (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)." which seem therefore to be two different excerpts from the same article in the journal Aleph (which is " an international peer reviewed annual journal, devoted to the exploration of the interface between Judaism and science in history" according tho their website). I think these two references are really one, I've edited the article accordingly. Pete.Hurd 03:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete one chapter in a contributed volume, and one peer reviewed paper, and no real demonstration of an impact on academic thought. I don't think this passes WP:PROF. Pete.Hurd 03:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.