Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaila Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 15:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Shaila Scott

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Radio personality of exclusively local "single station in a single market" notability, with no particularly strong evidence of notability that would pass WP:NMEDIA. Every single source here is weak or invalid for one reason or another: #1 and #4 are both entirely dead links, #2 mentions her name a single time in passing within an article that's otherwise about the radio station (thus failing to be substantive coverage of her), #3 sources a fact about the radio station she worked for without even mentioning her name at all (thus also failing to be any sort of coverage of her), #5 and #6 are both primary sources that cannot validly demonstrate notability, and #7 just links to an index of Billboard articles without even offering the slightest clue as to which article in that index might even possibly have anything whatsoever to do with her. In addition, the article has been directly edited in the past by User:Shailascottwbls — obvious WP:COI. No prejudice against future recreation if someone can create a properly written article that cites good sources which are substantively about her, but is not entitled to keep this. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 05:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: As presented, I would have to lean toward delete on this one. The article is a puff-piece and could/would likely be speedy-deleted for unambiguous promotion. I agree that the sources provided are only casual mentions of the subject, and do not demonstrate the "significant coverage" of the GNG. If this AfD is in danger of being closed, I'd ask for a relisting so we can get other eyes on it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 07:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 10:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.