Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shailendra Singh (singer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn with no delete proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 22:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Shailendra Singh (singer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete:The articles is not properly sourced and the notability is unclear. Fails WP:GNG  YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 07:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  YashPratap  1912 (CONT.) 07:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  YashPratap  1912 (CONT.) 07:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Keep: He was once known as Rishi Kapoor's voice and seems notable enough -User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 07:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Respected User:श्रीमान २००२, the article doesn't have enough citations to prove that and lacks the criteria for a verified article. YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 09:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Added 4 sources and maybe I will kind more in my grandmother's collection of old magazines. User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 12:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Are you, in any way related to the subject?-- YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 14:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Related as a blood relation or for monetary reasons ? No. Interested in him as a fan of his works ? Yes. --User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 03:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as has significant reliable sources coverage as added to the article since the start of the discussion so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Ok, now that the article has enough references, it′s notability can be clearly depicted. I think the deletion of the article is not required now. YashPratap 1912 (CONT.) 04:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.