Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShakeDeal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Closed by User:Liz but somehow the script didn't close discussion, though article was deleted. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 00:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

ShakeDeal

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A run-of-the-mill startup with no evidence of notability. The article relies on company announcements and press releases, which are insufficient to pass the WP:NCORP threshold. Maduant (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Websites,  and India. Maduant (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete This "start-up" is 6 years old now and the only coverage we have is funding announcements. If they haven't gotten critical notice in that time, there are likely no RS. I can't find anything beyond retailer PR websites and funding discussions. It's not even a start-up at this point. Oaktree b (talk) 22:58, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article about a B2B company, originally created via AfC. The article and its references largely concern service proposition and funding announcements, which are insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH. A couple of start-up industry awards are listed but these do not appear notable in their own right. Searches find a company founder being quoted in articles about wider economic prospects, but I am not seeing the coverage about the firm itself needed to demonstrate notability here, nor is there an article on Vora Ventures which could provide a redirect alternative.  AllyD (talk) 07:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * @Maduant Improve the Article: Appreciate your feedback and believe that additional sources could strengthen the article's credibility and meet the WP:NCORP threshold for notability. As the article was created in 2020 via 'AFC' template, and noticed that the information/citation may have become outdated. Instead of nominating for deletion, Addition of new sources can improve the article's notability. Niclepo (talk) 07:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Subject sources and BEFORE fails GNG and NCORP.  // Timothy :: talk  11:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NCORP -- Devoke  water  19:48, 29 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.