Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakeelur Rahman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Alex ShihTalk 03:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Shakeelur Rahman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:WRITER. Fails WP:GNG.  Greenbörg  (talk)  10:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - significant coverage is provided by the sources already in the article. PhilKnight (talk) 22:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 31 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Keep . May pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC).
 * Comment. Much of the content of our article appears to be a copyvio of the Indian Awaaz source. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:04, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I'm seeing some book mentions, as in: "Professor Shakeelur Rahman, a critic of Urdu literature, was the Vice Chancellor of two universities of Bihar and then became India's Health Minister in 1990..." Muslim Politics in Bihar: Changing Contours - Page 247. A full professor + minister = notability, in my book. Also seeing enough citations in Google books to justify a stub. If kept, remove the copyvio. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  21:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not sure what the relist is in aid of, since there appears to already be a unanimous consensus. The VC of two major universities and minister in the national government is clearly notable, and this is attested by the sources already in the article. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.