Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaker's Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 17:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Shaker's Law
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Unsourced article about a neologism. This search yields only 34 ghits. Fails WP:RS, WP:N, WP:NEO andy (talk) 08:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unreferenced neologism with no WP:RS coverage. See also: Talk:Shaker's Law. — Rankiri (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I can't find the original references as the site it appeared on has had a broken search facility for over a year and they are poorly indexed by google. I accept that it is a niche term, albeit widely used in that niche (atheist websites). I get 188 hits for the above search though. --Pappa (talk) 14:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Try going to the last results page. Google always massively overestimates the number of hits. In this case it says 188 but when you page through them there's only 34. I've tweaked the link in the nomination so it now goes to the last page. andy (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.