Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakes and Fidget


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 22:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Shakes and Fidget

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Only meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search were (not enough to substantiate an article). There are no worthwhile redirect targets as I don't believe we have a WoW culture article. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar 02:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  02:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with only one in-depth independent reliable source. May be covered in German sources, but I can't really locate any that look reliable. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 20:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unlikely better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and Hellknowz. -- ferret (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.