Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaking Through Web Series


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. As pointed out, there is no significant third-party coverage Black Kite (t) (c) 12:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Shaking Through Web Series

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article for a webseries of suspect notability. References are for the bands who played, not the webseries itself. Little coverage found in independent reliable sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: The series is recognized by music writers at Paste Magazine, Gorilla vs. Bear, Stereogum, IFC, and the Philadelphia Inquirer. The "flagged" comment says that few reliable, independent sources exist, but I find that not to be the case. A simple web search will bring such articles to light. Special:Contributions/mkmcglas (talk) 19:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)user:mkmcglas
 * Keep : New citations have been added to give the article some more stability.19:02, 30 June 2011 (UTC)user:mkmcglas — mkmcglas (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Shaking Through has almost 70 videos uploaded to Vimeo, some of which have over 15,000 views. As the series is only in its second year of operation, these numbers will surely consider to grow. Allysonwondrlnd (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2011 (UTC)allysonwondrlnd — Allysonwondrlnd (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep : The organization has a "stems" project (users can download raw tracks from the recording sessions, mix their own versions, and share them) that has had several hundred participants in 59 countries. 68.82.226.67 (talk)mkmcglas — 68.82.226.67 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 *Keep Media coverage on this series is substantial. Pitchfork, 2 IFC write-ups , IFC , Paste Magazine , and the Philadelphia Inquirer have all covered the series, among other publications. Allysonwondrlnd — Allysonwondrlnd (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Only two of the references that are not by the article's subject or its parent company actually mention it. One is the very definition of a trivial mention.  The other is an article just about the "Shaking Through" series, but I don't think that one secondary source is enough, and even if it were I'm not sure that the magazine it's in would meet notability guidelines if someone tried to create an article about it.  &Dagger; M A HE W A &Dagger;   &bull;   talk  02:05, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.