Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakir ul Qadri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Shakir ul Qadri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth coverage so seems to fail WP:NAUTHOR. He will fail WP:GNG too.  Greenbörg  (talk)  16:18, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  17:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I've tried searching with both the subject's name and his better known epithet. I can't find anything reliable about him; all hits which come up are for different individuals with similar names. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep on the basis of a fuller Urdu Wikipedia page suggesting better sourcing available. Bondegezou (talk) 16:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Could you please check this article?  Greenbörg  (talk)  07:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * No RS cited on Urdu WP. --Saqib (talk) 07:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails GNG guideline.122.172.215.246 (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - simply inadequate sourcing, and searches don't turn up anything to show it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:19, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.