Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shalom Dov Wolpo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.-- Wizardman 13:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Shalom Dov Wolpo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:BIO, his books seem to be self published, I don't think that he qualifies for an article yet. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  12:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:BIO, his books seem to be self published, I don't think that he qualifies for an article yet. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  12:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC) As there were significant changes and additions of sources to this article,, I withdraw my delete vote. --PinchasC |  £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  23:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please note that PinchasC is nominating this article for deletion because he is a Chabad anti-messianist, and he wants to keep all material about chabad messianists out of wikipeida. This guy is the originator of Chabad messianism which is why he (a) he is 100% notable and (b) PinchasC wants this article deleted.m Also note that his books have been discussed in numerous scholarly books and journals as they represented a paradigm shift in Chabad thinking.  ( talk · contribs · [ logs ] · block user · [ block log ] ) 13:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above is not true, I don't have the time to get into a petty argument now as to the conspiracy theories of why I nominated this article. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  13:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, so why have you nominated an article for deletion (part of a patern) which has numerous not-trivial sources, and when you know full well that the man is very very notable?  ( talk · contribs · [ logs ] · block user · [ block log ] ) 13:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.   IZAK 08:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The man is very very notable within the Haredi, and Israeli political world - indeed this article is largely a translation of the Israeli article on this man - which has much more material. He is regularly mentioned in the Hebrew press, and even the international press for example here, here, here,here, here, here, here and many many more.  I think that amply demonstrated that this man is notable by any wikipedia standard.   ( talk · contribs · [ logs ] · block user · [ block log ] ) 13:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO --Oskar 13:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep Looking at it again, I change to Weak Keep. --Oskar 17:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 15:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep multiple verifiable sources. Catchpole 18:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep If the article is factually correct (and there are sources cited), then the subject is notable. YechielMan 18:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. More than enough reliable sources presented to establish WP:V and meet WP:BIO. --Shirahadasha 20:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per everyone else. Acalamari 23:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per bountiful sources added that establish notability. -- M P er el ( talk 04:36, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep While his sources are self- published, they are nevertheless the main sources of messianic Chabad, they are quoted by other, friends and foes of Chabad, as the primary texts on the topic.--Jayrav 17:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep this notable Israeli Chabad rabbi (sorry, even a supposed meshichist can have his day in court.) IZAK 08:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.