Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sham peer review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep now that the article has been substantially improved. (aeropagitica) 19:49, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sham peer review
Looks like nothing more than advertising. Gnusmas 22:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Yomangani talk 23:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ramsquire 23:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as absolute WP:SPAM.-- danntm T C 03:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - now turned into a proper article by Uncle G. Gnusmas 15:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Significantly improved article. It still needs some work though to be more encyclopedic.--Nick Y. 17:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.