Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shambling mound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting this one. If someone thinks there is something in this article that they think should be added to whatever "merge" article they prefer, I'm happy to help provide you the material you need to do that (user-fy, etc). Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Shambling mound

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Previously deleted, but it has been well over a decade at this point. TTN (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. DnD cruft with OR on top (society section, etc., lol). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - The history of this article is a bit confusing, but it would appear that this was already deleted once at AFD, recreated as a redirect to Plant creatures (Dungeons & Dragons), and then, like so many other previously deleted/redirected D&D articles, restored to a full article against consensus by a anonymous IP editor. Regardless of this, though, it does not pass the WP:GNG.  The only sources are primary or trivial, and the article it was split out from is, itself, undergoing an AFD.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not the monster manual. WP:GAMEGUIDE -- Sirfurboy (talk) 16:48, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a monster manual. It actually is, but it is not supposed to be.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the previous AfD, as the article's sourcing has not improved at all after the previous discussion, and then salt to prevent further recreation attempts. Not a very active user (talk) 05:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment, NNNNOOOOOOO!!!!!! this can't be deleted as its an iconic (to D&Ders anyway) monster!! but coola with no reliable sources available this has to be a delete, ..... okay. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as above. Perfectly legitimate merge target and merging should always be preferred over deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't quite know how you would merge this into a list, and it fails our notability guidelines. SportingFlyer  T · C  11:42, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt As non-notable cruft. WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.