Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamik Dasgupta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  17:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Shamik Dasgupta

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 15:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as searches found several links at all News, browsers and WP:INDAFD but none of the suggesting a better notable article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  08:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 07:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - was able to find a fair number of mentions for Dasgupta and his works (examples:    ) - I believe by adding these sources and by completing the merge proposed in 2013 the article can be strengthened sufficiently to meet notability. Artw (talk) 07:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.