Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamil Mamedov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Shamil Mamedov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG Nswix (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Martial arts, Wrestling,  and Russia. Nswix (talk) 23:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Fails WP:GNG.--Bexaendos (talk) 17:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)


 * KEEP - He won gold at the Junior Wrestling World Championships - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_World_Junior_Wrestling_Championships. The event is significant enough to be included in the wrestling template - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wrestling. The media in the US does not cover amateur wrestling on a mainstream scale minus the Olympics and never covers foreign amateur wrestling.KatoKungLee (talk) 18:10, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Junior accomplishments don't satisfy WP:MANOTE Nswix (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't think it clears the independent RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth test. BLPs need to be completely based on clearly independent unbiased RS about the subject.  // Timothy :: talk  03:00, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete A junior championship is not sufficient to show WP notability and he's had no success at a major competition as an adult, at least not yet. I checked all the sources, except for one that my computer flagged as suspicious, and they consist of interviews, results, and a database entry.  There are no examples of the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 14:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't see anything demonstrating GNG has been met. Agreed with Papaursa's assessment of current sources. JoelleJay (talk) 21:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.