Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanazar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep/Nomination withdrawn. Davewild (talk) 18:17, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Shanazar

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Sonic comic articles. As such, this material is not appropriate for the encyclopedia, is also entirely duplicative and can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 04:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per the nom's reason; Not notable. - Rjd0060 04:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Twenty Years 15:45, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Have edited article with links to source and citation of relevant issues to make it more appropriate. Charles RB 01:17, 04/12/2007 (UK timezone) —Preceding comment was added at 01:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you add a few more? I will then withdraw the nomination, happily :) Judgesurreal777 01:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll try - quite a bit of info was available all in the same link though, so I can only use it as a reference the once. Charles RB 02:12, 4/12/07 (UTC)
 * Added some extra references and issue numbers, as well as some extra data (including mention of fan reaction, with link). Charles RB, 02:52, 4/12/07 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article is a about a location of a major (and long running) story arc within Sonic the Comic. Nabs 11:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * While I strongly encourage you to continue to add references to this article, especially any that are not forums for fans, I believe you have asserted notability in a limited way. Please keep building up this article so you don't see this tag on this article again :) Judgesurreal777 16:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions.  -- Hiding T 17:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Withdraw - The article has established notability in at minimum a limited sense, and that was the nomination rationale. Thanks to Charles RB for his good work. Judgesurreal777 16:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.