Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Culkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Shane Culkin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable relative of a celebrity. Has only one credit, a minor role in a TV production. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for utter failure to establish notability. Eddie.willers (talk) 19:31, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I just voted delete on the last Culkin family member with insufficient notability for a stand-alone article. Can the group be merged and combined into a Culkin family article with the combined exploits until one or more of the individuals become notable? ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As I said in the other, simply being an actor isn't notable, nor is being related to a notable person. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No major roles, lacks independant coverage. Being related to a famous person does not make your famous. Edward321 (talk) 14:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom or redirect to Kit Culkin. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.