Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Donovan and Kimberly Brady


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Shane Donovan and Kimberly Brady

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure WP:FANCRUFT about a couple who were on the show Days Of Our Lives, that needs to be deleted. Pahiy (talk) 00:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:04, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PLOT - this is just a summary of their character arc with no out-of-universe content whatsoever. Doesn't belong on Wikipedia MDDevice talk 01:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  J  947 &thinsp;(c) , at 02:27, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of passing GNG. In current form belongs on wikia/fandom site, not here. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Soap Opera Super Couples: The Great Romances of Daytime Drama has a section about the couple, and No End to Her: Soap Opera and the Female Subject discusses the couple's storylines. The couple also won two Soap Opera Digest Awards, as supported by these two sources, (1 and 2). The Odessa American, the St Joseph News-Press, and the Tampa Tribune each include brief references to the couple's popularity with fans. I do not believe this alone is enough to support independent notability, but there does seem to be at least some coverage from third-party, reliable sources on this couple. With that being said, I am not opposed to deletion since the information on the couple could be kept in the articles on the respective characters instead of an entirely separate article. Aoba47 (talk) 00:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Belongs on fandom. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:26, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - I guess an article on a fictional relationship with enough coverage could be a thing, but this is lacking coverage. TTN (talk) 22:00, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.