Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shankar Abaji Bhise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 04:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Shankar Abaji Bhise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Patent holder and inventor, who likely does not meet the criteria for notability. Needs reliable sources to that end, if they can be found. Quinto Simmaco (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - while a prolific inventor, I cannot find any reliable references to indicate that he was noticed for these ideas. Primefac (talk) 12:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a pointy nomination in response to the deletion of the recreated article Sachin Lokapure. The SOCK that created that article used this as an OTHERSTUFFEXISTS example and said they would start nominating articles for deletion. The subject of this article invented the Bhisotype Single Typecaster - See Bhisotype: The Method and Economy of the New Single Type Caster and Composer . This passes WP:ANYBIO as the contribution was notable in the evolution of printing. For some background on the article subject see  Note: This is from National Institute of Science Communication and Information Resources. See About NISCAIR it is RS and already cited. . Another source is Dhumatkar, Abhidha The Indian Edison in Economic and Political Weekly Oct 16, 2010  Searching the web I have seen reference to a Scientific American article but I do not have access to the archives. There is likely more information in Indian sources for those who know the language. Jbh (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: For the closing admin, the sock that Jbhunley is referring to is and the deleted talk page at Talk:Sachin Lokapure. I'm not sure I would classify this as a pointy nomination though as Quinto Simmaco is not a sock of . -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep- Notable figure Educationtemple (talk) 19:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.