Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete redirect, WP:PLOT. Cool Hand Luke 01:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Shannis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete-An article about a couple in a british soap opera. Not noteable, reads like a story. If every soap opera couple in the world had their own article, there'd be no internet room left. Re-direct to EastEnders. Dalejenkins | The Apprentice (UK Series Three)'s Peer Review-Review now please! 18:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unable to find sources to establish notability. Article is almost entirely plot summary. JulesH 18:52, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Storylines of EastEnders (2000s) Stephenb (Talk) 20:29, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * comment I really think it would be better if the articles had been nominated in groups of approximately similar content and importance. DGG (talk) 06:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, and then the bitching would start about how impossible it is to consider a mass nomination. Otto4711 18:13, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PLOT. Otto4711 18:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I thought the whole point of Wikipedia is it's not paper so there's room for everything notable.--Bedivere 21:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The point of WP:NOTPAPER is not that any article someone feels like writing gets kept. PAPER specifically states that it is not a free pass for articles and that all articles must still meet applicable policies and guidelines. Otto4711 18:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, Of course, but the nominator was wrong to say "If every soap opera couple in the world had their own article, there'd be no internet room left." &mdash; AnemoneProjectors (会話) 19:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I tend to read that as hyperbole as opposed to an actual concern that Wikipedia will run out of room. Otto4711 01:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep has the potential to be more than plot summary. Gung  adin  ♦  15:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bedivere. --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 19:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Bedivere's argument is based on WP:NOTPAPER and since that does not serve to save an otherwise unacceptable article a keep opinion based on it is rather weak. Otto4711 01:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nothing more than a plot summary already covered at the individual characters articles Nuttah68 10:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gungadin. &mdash; AnemoneProjectors (会話) 11:20, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable Harlowraman 17:10, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure plot summary. --Phirazo 17:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.