Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Cunniff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  13:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Shannon Cunniff

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:GNG (WP:BASIC) currently. All the sources currently on the page are not independent from her. I have also not been able to find any independent sources. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

I understand concern about sources, and I will do my best to address it. Ms. Cunniff is significant within the environmental policy world, and especially given the limited visibility of women in such fields, it's important that her page remain if at all possible. I will use the page for one of her male colleagues, Fred Krupp, as a model while reworking the article. Note that several of the sources on his page are also published by the environmental defense fund, for which he works. UrbanLandReader (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't use that as a model; it's not a good article and has only survived because it was created in 2006, before some of our present guidelines were formulated. Deb (talk) 14:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 12:16, 24 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 12:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Has anyone looked at the edits to the article? UrbanLandReader (talk) 16:27, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete unless someone will remove the promotional tone of it.Trillfendi (talk) 02:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds very promotional in it's tone which would violate WP:PROMO, the subject also does not pass WP:GNG and WP:BASIC for lack of *signifcant coverage secondary sources per WP:SIGCOV*, something that is just not present here. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, gidonb (talk) 03:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

I tried to edit some of the promotional tone... was the concern that it was promotional of the subject or of a particular environmental perspective? Because her profession is an environmental advocate. UrbanLandReader (talk) 17:50, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:PROF. No coverage to pass WP:GNG. Just someone doing their job. Not encyclopedic due to achievements (yet). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.