Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Gibney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Shannon Gibney

 * — (View AfD)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- . Based on the I am listing here. This is not a valid speedy deletion reason, therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 22:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * delete A single work only available as a digital download from amazon.com does not a 'prolific' author make MNewnham 23:07, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The only keep possibility I could see was the section on awards or external reviews near the bottom of the criteria list for WP:BIO, but I don't think a single award quite does it.--Kchase T 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The bio needs some streamlining, but she's reasonably prolific in MN. Kvangtw92 07:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article does assert but does not establish notability. Current version of article looks like a resume.  Chondrite 23:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.