Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Kahrig

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:21, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

Shannon Kahrig
As usual, vain, vain, vanity.... ;) - Mailer Diablo 02:40, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete; it is vanity.  &#1090;&#601; z&#1108; &#1090;&#1110;
 * Delete, hardly worth debating. Plus, somebody removed the "vfd" line at least once already. -Deadcorpse 03:36, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Aw, how sweet. Delete - David Gerard 13:28, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Well, someone likes her, but having friends or admirers at school doesn't make you notable. Average Earthman 14:02, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing to do with anything --Feitclub 19:47, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete And recently added a round of abuse of the VFDers, now (which I've just removed).  Alai 21:46, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity and not noteworthy. --ElTyrant 23:11, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 15:05, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not sure if this is weird vanity or someone else's personal attack... either way... --BD2412 04:48, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not remotely interesting, notable, grammatically correct, orthographically correct. What do they teach them at school nowadays? --Orelstrigo 13:44, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Does she really love gorillas? How marvelous! Well anyways, Delete this useless vanity. vlad_mv 15:14, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.