Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon Stewart (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to America's Next Top Model. Sarahj2107 (talk) 18:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

Shannon Stewart (model)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only coverage I could find is routine coverage of America's Next Top Model and interviews which simply state she was a contestant on the show. Could easily be covered in ANTM cycle 1 and/or ANTM cycle 17 (WP:BLP1E). Propose redirect to America's Next Top Model for this reason. Bold redirect was reverted by with no rationale. Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 06:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect as proposed. In a brief search, I can't find anything significant that is unrelated to America's Next Top Model, so I don't think WP:BIO is met (although sometimes it's tough to be certain when Googling relatively common names such the subject's).  Redirecting the reader to the relevant America's Next Top Model page is best.  Edgeweyes (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep All you have to do is find more sources for the post-antm career, pageantry and personal life. This person is very notable off the show, and has more modeling work than what's on the section. This same user deleted pages for the other runner-ups and contestants AND removed the last names of the foreign contestants for the worst possible reasons so I would take him with a grain of salt. The page will be kept, and the other pages will be revived after their wrong deletion, this is bullshit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:ADHOM – the purpose of this discussion is to assess whether Shannon Stewart merits a standalone article. Arguments about a nominator's actions will not influence the outcome of a deletion discussion. I'd suggest you provide links to reliable secondary sources that show that the subject meets WP:GNG. Also, I recommend you read WP:AGF. Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 23:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ignoring the most recent !vote as not policy-based, consensus would be to redirect, but there are too few !votes to base consensus on.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 08:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC) Keep What sources did you try to find? She was in ads for Macy's, Dillard's, Sephora, Teen vogue which you can find on All-Antm. (And no, it is NOT an unreliable source, because fanart and fake images are not allowed as their policy.) and her double season appearance on the show, plus guest spots on other cycles, plus her beauty pageant history (nationally mind you) there is no way this person isn't notable. this page will be kept. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratherbe2000 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect. I agree with the nominator's arguments. The sources on the page, and those I can find from searches fall well short of establishing notability. Mcewan (talk) 09:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Your second keep vote has been struck because users are not allowed to vote more than once. Again, if you can find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independant of the subject (per WP:GNG) and verify this information, that will support your argument. All-ANTM appears to be a website created by an anonymous Internet user so it cannot be considered a reliable source. See WP:IRS for info about identifying reliable sources. You may also wish to read WP:BLP1E, WP:BIO1E and WP:ASSERTN. Linguist un Eins uno (Linguist111) 17:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect All rather pedestrian routine non notable coverage. Nothing in depth either. Curdle (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.