Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shannon systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash talk 22:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Shannon systems
Advertisement. Probably doesn't meet WP:CORP but that's unverifiable as it doesn't release figures it is believed to be one of the largest full service EDI providers is asserted.
 * Delete as per my nom.  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  01:04, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Google provides no evidence of notoriety. Fagstein 04:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising per nom Dakota  ~  ε  06:41, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant advertising. J I P  | Talk 09:37, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I really did want to vote Keep because I like EDI (in a geeky kind of way) and they do look as if they are doing a valuable job, but in the end the tone of their advertorial (which forms a lot of the highest Google hits, of which there are in any case very few) really doesn't make the case. I love companies where you get to talk to a techie, but "we don't have a helpdesk" sounds a lot like "we don't have enough customers to need one".  If anyone can verify a sizeable customer base (they claim "many", which is not quite the thing) then I'll change my vote.  Provided the linspam goes from the section heading. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 10:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.