Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shantanu Agrahari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 06:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Shantanu Agrahari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Bureaucrats are not inherently notable. Further due to lack of sufficient coverage in reliable sources the subjects fails general guidelines about notability. He has only passing mention in few sources. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Delete IAS officers are not inherently notable. There are no independent, reliable references about him in the article. Unable to find any good refs. Bgwhite (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable subject, completely agree with BgwhiteItsalleasy (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Far too junior for any form of inherent notability and doesn't seem to be notable in any other way. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not Notable for stand alone Drsharan (talk) 10:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.