Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shantinath Jain temple, Chennai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG. Not convinced by the new sourcing added.

Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Deletion review - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays! Missvain (talk) 01:53, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Shantinath Jain temple, Chennai

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No indication of notability of this temple. Fails WP:GNG. Such temples are located in every street and there are more than 100 in Chennai. Venkat TL (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article was initially created with a single source, but now additional book sources have been added. With this, I think the article passes WP:GNG. It appears that there is scope for expanding the article since the temple is perhaps the most important Jain temple in the city. Rasnaboy (talk) 14:41, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @Rasnaboy Please describe here, the length and the details of the coverage along with the source. From what I have seen in my WP:BEFORE only passing mentions or a short para on the temple was found (they do not pass the "significant depth of coverage" criteria of GNG). There is nothing that makes this temple stand out among other temples. Venkat TL (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Muthiah (2014) describes the temple in detail, and many of the info in the article are from that source. Lang et al. (1997) isn't as detailed as Muthiah but both are secondary sources befitting the GNG. Although there aren't numerous sources available online, the availability of secondary sources discussing about the temple more than just a passing mention is what makes me see a scope for expansion. Rasnaboy (talk) 18:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * You are still being vague about the length and the detail of coverage. This book is a travel guide. And as expected it makes 1 mention of this temple. I don't consider a single mention as significant coverage. Neither the notability has been asserted in any way nor sources with in depth coverage available. Venkat TL (talk) 18:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.