Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shapur Mozaffarian (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. The general consensus here seems to be there's one good source (NY Times), but until another good source is found, this isn't ready for mainspace. Opinion is about evenly split between delete and draftify, but going with the latter out of respect for WP:ATD. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:24, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Shapur Mozaffarian
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Second nomination. Looks as not notable business person Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO, although that NYT article is a good source, and I'd change to a keep if any other good sources turned up. Article created by SPA with no other edits.  Nha Trang  Allons! 23:07, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per previous notes, the NYT article is decent, but the Wash. Post article doesn't even mention this person. Seems to fit the WP:BIO1E category, not notable enough for inclusion, and the SPA author is also a red flag for me. - SanAnMan (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft. The NYT article is pretty clear about his being well-known for providing jewelry for other famous people as well. BLP1E is therefore irrelevant. I am usually very reluctant to accept articles of this sort, or with this sort of notability as a provider of ...., but I have the feeling that he is indeed notable.   But we do need another good reference. DGG ( talk ) 23:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft I suppose if needed as there's certainly still nothing to suggest the needed enhancements for convincing notability. I myself would've reviewed and nominated if not for a now-uncovered and kicked user taking it first. SwisterTwister   talk  00:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.